Browse by Tags

All Tags » Deployment (RSS)

Content DB's - clearing up some confusion

Just thought I would qualify something, as I have been asked this a few times of late, and sometimes by people whom I would have expected to have understood this... · Within SharePoint (v2 or v3) the lowest ratio of content DB’s to Web Applications (virtual servers in v2) is 1:1 · You have multiple content DB’s for a given web application. · You can have multiple site collections in a web application. · The lowest ratio of content DB’s to site collections is 1:1 · You can have multiple site collections...( read more ) Del.icio.us | Digg It | Technorati | Blinklist | Furl | reddit | DotNetKicks
Posted by SharePoint Blogs

New version of Content Deployment Wizard released

I'm happy to announce that development/testing of the next version of the SharePoint Content Deployment Wizard is now complete, and the new release has been uploaded to Codeplex. If you're not aware of the tool then Introducing the SharePoint Read More......( read more ) Del.icio.us | Digg It | Technorati | Blinklist | Furl | reddit | DotNetKicks
Posted by SharePoint Blogs
Filed under: ,

SUGUK session

The SUGUK session (Tuesday 12th) went well! Hopefully everyone found the session informative, the feedback forms show very positive feedback (attendees: feel free to post your thoughts here ). If you missed the session it may be repeated (if there is demand) at future events. Thanks to all who attended, especially those who travelled a distance to listen to me, I hope you found it benificial and enjoyed our hospitality... For those who were after the deck, it's available here Posted to www.sharepointblogs...( read more ) Del.icio.us | Digg It | Technorati | Blinklist | Furl | reddit | DotNetKicks

SUGUK Event on Feb 12th

The next midlands based SharePoint User Group Event will be on Feb 12th in Coventry... I am told the guest speaker is very good Sign up here: http://suguk.org/forums/thread/8064.aspx Posted to www.sharepointblogs.com/mattg by Matt Groves (SharePoint Blogger). Posted on SharePoint Blogs...( read more ) Del.icio.us | Digg It | Technorati | Blinklist | Furl | reddit | DotNetKicks

External BLOB Storage Provider (EBS)

I think AJAX stole the spotlight with MOSS SP1.. The feature I'm most excited with is External BLOB Storage Provider (EBS). "A large proportion of data files are represented as unstructured binary files—that is, binary large object (BLOB) data Read More......( read more ) Del.icio.us | Digg It | Technorati | Blinklist | Furl | reddit | DotNetKicks
Posted by SharePoint Blogs

WebPart File is not Overwritten After First Solution Deployment

We setup a nightly build process for a recent client which automagically builds and deploys a SharePoint solution. Soon after it was implemented we realized that our (one) WebPart wasn't updating in the WebPart gallery of our target site. In other words, the developers were checking in changes to the .webpart file in TFS, that .webpart file was being deployed to the target site, the feature was being reactivated without issue, but the .webpart file in the WebPart Gallery List remained unchanged. I suspect that this may have something to do with how we were doing successive deployments (using deploy/install instead of upgrade?), but I figured I'd come up with a solution to the problem within the feature itself. Pretty simple, actually. I wrote a piece of feature receiver code that, on feature deactivating, programmatically removes the WebPart file from the Web Part Gallery. The Feature: <Feature Id="7CAB976B-018D-4ec8-B1A2-354ED7645795" Title="AIS Sample Hello World WebPart" Description="Basic WebPart example." Hidden="FALSE" Scope="Site" ImageUrl="actionsettings.gif" ReceiverAssembly="AIS.SharePoint.Utilities, Version=1.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=a961f5844c0e1ceb" ReceiverClass="AIS.SharePoint.Utilities.EventReceivers.AisWebPartFeaturReceiver" xmlns=" http://schemas.microsoft.com/sharepoint/ "> <ElementManifests> <ElementManifest Location="ProvisionedFiles...

Using the SharePoint Content Deployment Wizard

So if you've read the earlier posts about the tool ( Introducing the SharePoint Content Deployment Wizard and When to use the SharePoint Content Deployment Wizard ) and figure this is a useful tool, let's go onto the next level of detail. Generally Read More......( read more ) Del.icio.us | Digg It | Technorati | Blinklist | Furl | reddit | DotNetKicks

Deploying site columns and content types to sharepoint webs

Hi everyone! It's been a long time since my last (and first) post. Mostly because my job is keeping me insanely busy these days, but also since there are so many excellent SharePoint bloggers out there that it's not every day you discover something worth blogging that someone hasn't already written about. But last week i ran into a problem when we were about to create some features and site definitions to deploy a portal for one of our customers that I thought maybe would be of interest to other people. The portal consisted of one site collection on the top level and several levels of webs underneath. On some of the subwebs we had created site columns with lookups to lists on that web and based content types on them. We knew that we could deploy content types and site columns using the feature framework and we tried to do just that only to discover that stsadm would spurt out nasty error messages telling us that features with web scope cannot be used to deploy that type of content. "No Problem", I thought, "I'll just create a small app that uses the API to add them instead". But that proved to be easier said than done since the API require your content type to inherit from existing content types and when you do, it will create new GUIDS for them which just cut it for us. So what I ended up doing (once again) was to reverse engineer selected parts of SharePoint and trick it into adding content types and site columns on webs using specific GUIDs...

When to use the SharePoint Content Deployment Wizard

Following my introduction to the tool last time, today I want to try to help position the tool for people who aren't sure if it could be useful to them or for what scenarios - if you only take one thing away from my postings on the Content Deployment Read More......( read more ) Del.icio.us | Digg It | Technorati | Blinklist | Furl | reddit | DotNetKicks

Why Alternate Access Mappings will give you a headache

I love the new Alternate Access Mappings feature in MOSS 2007 (not available in WSS) but it can be a major pain in the behind. One of the things you probably will stumble upon when installing MOSS is the need to expose some or all of the content to the outside. So far I've been lucky enough to deal with situations where it's all or nothing, making life somewhat easier. Still, there's quite a few things that can foul up the waters, including AAM. Now, if you're going to expose MOSS, or any web site, to the outside you will want to do this via https (at least not plain old http) which means that you'll need to make sure that MOSS understands https:/... access and, most likely, start using https internally as well. This involves, besides installing certificates, changing the AAM settings. The thing with AAM is that it (AFAIK, correct me if I'm wrong) controls all the automatic URL's generation throughout that collection. This means that if you need to change the My Site location from http://mysite.corporate.com to https://mysite.corporate.com you need to update the AAM to reflect this. To do this you change the Default mapping for the My Site AAM collection from http://mysite... to https://mysite... If you fail to change the AAM before you update the My Site location MOSS happily and without telling you changes back to http://mysite... If you're really lucky you'll get something along the lines of https://mysite.corporate.com:80 which, of course...
Posted by SharePoint Blogs

Introducing the SharePoint Content Deployment Wizard

Regular readers might have spotted I've been slightly quieter than usual over the past few weeks - actually I've not been slacking, but working on a tool which you might find useful from time to time. As I've discussed in numerous posts, deployment Read More......( read more ) Del.icio.us | Digg It | Technorati | Blinklist | Furl | reddit | DotNetKicks

Change a SharePoint site's URL

Something you may find yourself tasked with at some point, is changing the URL of an existing SharePoint 2007 site. This is a fairly interesting scenario, and it's fair to say the relationship between SharePoint and IIS makes this more complex than Read More......( read more ) Del.icio.us | Digg It | Technorati | Blinklist | Furl | reddit | DotNetKicks

STSADM export, Content Deployment, Content Migration API, Features/Solutions - deployment options compared

Back in May I wrote a post titled SharePoint deployment options : Features or Content Deployment? , which discussed some thoughts on what was the "right" way to move assets from development to production (and perhaps environments in between Read More......( read more ) Del.icio.us | Digg It | Technorati | Blinklist | Furl | reddit | DotNetKicks

Can I do this with a solution file?

I have created a number of templates for various types of sites for our internal MOSS. One of these are a customer site that - among other things - has a subsite for all our projects related to this customer. When I save this site as a template I include all the content as I've created a number of custom web part pages in a document library that we use but there is no way for me to include the project subsite. Would it be possible to use a solution file for this? According to this MSDN article it doesn't sound like a solution file is the answer. Is there an easy way to accomplish this or am I forced to create the project subsite manually for each new customer? Posted on SharePoint Blogs Del.icio.us | Digg It | Technorati | Blinklist | Furl | reddit | DotNetKicks

Deployment using STSADM export or content migration API

Having focused on deployment using Features for several articles, back in May I wrote an article titled SharePoint deployment options : Features or Content Deployment? , which explored some of the decisions around deployment strategies for SharePoint Read More......( read more ) Del.icio.us | Digg It | Technorati | Blinklist | Furl | reddit | DotNetKicks
More Posts Next page »